Punishment for disobedience

[Tdawg37]

I went to my ex mistress house for a month one summer. I came wearing what I was suppose to. I was wearing my butt plug my nipple clamps and my pink panties. I took my usual two bag enema in examination room. I went to get up and she nodded her head and said Lay back down bitch.

I laid back down and was ordered to prop my legs up on the gynecology leg rests. When I laid them on the leg rests she taped them down. I asked why I was being tied up and she said I wasn't on time and this was my punishment. She strapped an electric strip around my semi-hard penis and put a hood on my face. This hood only had holes in the nose for me to breath and a penis gag on the mouth.

Once she restrained my arms straight out. She began to write on me. Once she was done she started shocking my penis over and over. I thought the shocking would never end but it did. She took off the e-stim and pulled out a ball stretcher and put it on me along with nipple clamps. Then she pulled out a remote and made my butt plug vibrate. Once the physical torture was done it was time for some mental torture. She untied me and drug me to the car and cuffed me to the seat.

While I was in the seat she traded the hood out for a mouth claw with nose hook on it. For those who don't know what this is it pulls your mouth open and pulls your nostrils up it is very humiliating. And she put my posture collar on that said SLUT on it. She took me to the local barber shop and instructed me to please her friends while she got her hair cut.

When we went inside the place was packed. I was so embarrassed because I was only wearing the pink panties. The women there started laughing and taking pictures of me drooling. One girl was adventurous and took me to a back room and took her clothes off and shoved her pussy in my face and said ,"lick or I vibrate your pussy ass." I unwillingly began to lick her wet pussy. She vibrated my ass anyways.

Out of nowhere my mistress came in with a man. She said I was to pleasure him. I tried to run but i was quickly caught and cuffed to a chair. He grabbed my head and shoved his dick in my mouth. Unwillingly I came from my butt plug vibrating and I accidentally came on him. He said I was gonna regret that he pulled his dick out and whacked off till he came straight in my mouth and all over me. Before he could cum again my mistress came back and got me up and took me home.

[now111]

Is BDSM a way of reconcilling yourself with your gay feelings? Seems a little extreme to me. Most other gay blokes just accept it and go to a bar.

[Tdawg37]

I'm not gay

[now111]

Really?? Butt plugs? Penis gags? Cumming over blokes? Allowing a bloke to cum in your mouth? You being a bloke yourself? "Unwillingly" pleasuring women? If you put it to a poll, I'd say an overwhelming amount of people would say you're kidding yourself.

[Tdawg37]

Well I'm not gay

[now111]

You do know what "gay" means, I take it? It doesn't have a different meaning in your part of the world? Over here it means homosexual, and is generally used to describe someone who indulges in all the above activities.

[Tdawg37]

Yes I know what gay means and I am not gay I took the cock because I didn't have a choice

[now111]

This was totally without your consent? In that case, you've been sexually assaulted by a man, and it really should be a police matter.

[Tdawg37]

It's complicated but no it's not breaking any agreement me and mistress had made so it's not sexual assault

[now111]

So it was with your consent... This is really baffling me. You definately seem to be using a woman as an excuse to get gay with a bloke. Was he gay? I assume he must have been to wank all over you. So why did you need the input of a woman? Seems that she didn't do much except introduce the pair of you. You could have done that in a gay bar, and saved the money you presumably paid this 'mistress'. I suppose the involvement of the woman might have been to make you feel less gay. Unless I've still got it all wrong - I'd love you to explain the thought process behind you concluding that what you did wasn't gay - don't mind if it's complicated, I'm intelligent enough to follow most complications. Out of idle curiosity, anyone else have an opinion on this strange case?

[Tdawg37]

You must not know much about bdsm and femdom it's a matter of what your mistress wants you to do you either do what she says or face the consequences

[now111]

The consequences would be greater than a bloke wanking into your mouth ???? What could she possibly do that was worse than that?

[Miss Belladonnah]

She could force him to take a huge cock up his arse. :eek: ...Would that be worse?
:think2:
--
Miss Belladonnah.

[Tdawg37]

There's way worse than that

[Tdawg37]

And I really had to take the cock because I cuffed to the chair and my mouth was forced open by the gag and I couldn't take it off

[cycollegeman]

I'd say that you were sexually assaulted. Unwillingness to comply which was your case means just that - sexually assaulted.

And it seems that it is you dear Tdawg37 who is unaware of Femdom and BDSM. Any Mistress would make you do anything AS LONG as you are ok with it. Anything beyond your own personal limit has nothing to do with BDSM/Femdom.

And you actually came while another man inserted his cock in your mouth. Yes, that's is gay, or to say the least, you like both sexes.

[now111]

I'd say that you were sexually assaulted. Unwillingness to comply which was your case means just that - sexually assaulted.

And it seems that it is you dear Tdawg37 who is unaware of Femdom and BDSM. Any Mistress would make you do anything AS LONG as you are ok with it. Anything beyond your own personal limit has nothing to do with BDSM/Femdom.

And you actually came while another man inserted his cock in your mouth. Yes, that's is gay, or to say the least, you like both sexes.

This is just spot on. I was simply too bemused to make such an insightful comment.

[Tdawg37]

I came because of the vibrating butt plug

[now111]

I came because of the vibrating butt plug

A bloke wanking off into your mouth didn't put you off orgasm? Did you forget he was there? I hate to tell you this, but exclusively hetrosexual men would be physically unable to become anywhere near enough aroused to even contemplate orgasm if another bloke was wacking off into his mouth. Sorry mate, but you are gay. At least partly.

[Tdawg37]

Definitely not man I know it seems like it I'm straight man but I lived to please my mistress

[divineinspiration]

I'm intelligent enough to follow most complications. Out of idle curiosity, anyone else have an opinion on this strange case?

All we have here are fantasy adventures of Tdawg37. When Tdawg37 is 'wearing pink panties' such fantasy never happened in real. Pink panties mean he's a 'baby' in such and such circumstances, he's 'innocent'.

The lady who 'took her clothes off and shoved her pussy in my face and said ,"lick or I vibrate your pussy ass." I unwillingly began to lick her wet pussy' is not his Mistress, just other woman, he licked her unwillingly because he belongs to his Mistress and willingly licks only her pussy.

The other man who 'grabbed my head and shoved his dick in my mouth. Unwillingly I came from my butt plug vibrating and I accidentally came on him. he pulled his dick out and whacked off till he came straight in my mouth and all over me.' is a man whom with Tdawg37 has threesome along with his Mistress. Tdawg37 wants to run, he doesn't want that threesome.

'Before he could cum again my mistress came back and got me up and took me home. ' - this means he wouldn't want to be in a threesome or have sex with other males, also while Mistress is out for a while, it means he is deeply ashamed of being done by the male. That is why Mistress mustn't see action m on m, it deeply humiliates Tdawg37 (abuse).

Here: ' his dick in my mouth. Unwillingly I came from my butt plug vibrating ' , he came only because his Mistress wanted him to be subjected by that man and she wanted him to come.

The guy says by the story: I don't want any sexual play with men.
He isn't gay.

Other comments on topic: you people are right, Tdawg37 has no idea about bdsm and consent. He fantasizes about bdsm but only in categories of abuse. It could never please him. Nowhere in his story Tdawg37 comes from simple pleasure, it isn't pleasurable to him at all. He's straight as he writes he is.

This story seems not to make sense to all of you, because it never happened, it's fantasy. Abuse could have happened to him though.
Story is slightly 'disjointed', because it is effect of daydreaming.

[Tdawg37]

Thanks man but the story is actually true

[divineinspiration]

Thanks man but the story is actually true

I hardly dispute what's true to you, to your reality, imagination or sublimation. Let third party citation be the hint for you.

[Pincushion]

I hardly dispute what's true to you, to your reality, imagination or sublimation. Let third party citation be the hint for you.

Well my hitherto private gut feeling on the subject of Tdawg37 and his orientation (and I hope that you'll forgive me saying so Tdawg37), is that although he seems a little deluded he is in just the right place to share the things which get him off and which do no harm to others.

divineinspiration, it would seem from your 3 posts at the time of writing, that you are also here to share the thing which gets you off and which is potentially not without risk of harm to others: Psychobabble.

I acknowlege that 3 posts isn't much to judge things by but it is certainly a good starting point for us to make assessment of you. What you have posted about Tdawg37 suggests very strongly that you have no qualifications to make these statements whatsoever in that:

1) Every practitioner of sciences knows the importance of qualifying their assertions with facts and references. This puts you firmly in the "pseudo science" camp.

2) No professional would elaborate at such length on a 'case' where the only facts available were a few posts on an internet forum and no personal contact or aquaintance had been made and no consent given to publish an analysis publicly.

3) No professional would have the time or the enthusiasm to construct lengthy posts for unpaid and unconsenting clients. Neither would they break their professional code of conduct by doing so.

I would conclude therefore (unless you care to prove otherwise) that what "gets you off" is writing lengthy tomes of seemingly post - Freudian inspired garbage based on stuff you have read over the years, and then addressing them to unsuspecting forum members; in other words you have a thing for playing around with the psyche. And if you are old enough to have a membership here at MDFF then surely you are old enough to know better?

[divineinspiration]

Again: I hardly dispute what's true to you, to your reality, imagination or sublimation. Let third party citation be the hint for you.

'I would conclude therefore (unless you care to prove otherwise) that [...]', again: I hardly dispute what's true to you, to your reality, imagination or sublimation. Also, I hardly see exchange of posts on a forum a Judgement Day.

[Pincushion]

again: I hardly dispute what's true to you, to your reality, imagination or sublimation. Also, I hardly see exchange of posts on a forum a Judgement Day.

QED: Psychobabble.


There are those who seem unduly pre-occupied with the idea of their own and other peoples personal "reality, imagination or sublimation" and lose track of the fact that we and our world are not figments of our own imagination. The great Dr. Samuel Johnson famously responded to one whose ilk you seem to be, by stubbing his toe on a large stone and saying "I refute it thus."

I sincerely hope that an exchange of posts does not constitute any sort of "Judgment Day". Nevertheless, those of us who believe in any sort of reality outside of our own narrow point of reference find it to be right and courteous to make the sort of statements which we are happy leave open to objective scrutiny.

You don't seem to have much to say in your response to me other than a rehash from your original post. I'm sure that there is some such website as amateurpsychology.com where you can add to your repertoire for future dialogue. Which rather links to the whole reason for my post: Listening to amateur psychologists is about as helpful as engaging amateur dentists for root canal surgery.

[divineinspiration]

You don't seem to have much to say in your response to me [...]

I don't Have much more to say than what I already said.
That is why you see no more. Because I already said it. I said just enough and in case you have your doubts you are able to go back to what I already said. At this point, again, I have nothing to discuss with you and that is why I don't proceed.
Should this change I might proceed.

[Pincushion]

I don't Have much more to say than what I already said.

So I see - but thank you anyway for your explaination.

"Blessed is the man who having nothing to say, abstains from giving wordy evidence of the fact" - George Eliot

[divineinspiration]

"Blessed is the man who having nothing to say, abstains from giving wordy evidence of the fact" - George Eliot

''Short words are best and the old words when short are best of all.'' - Churn_ill,
churn_ill

[Pincushion]

''Short words are best and the old words when short are best of all.'' - Churn_ill,
churn_ill

A suitably pithy apothegm in its context too! I must admit that I have never heard of churn_ill myself - is he a Vietnamese philosopher?

Co-incidentally that very saying was originally phrased by Winston Churchill. Dear old churn_ill must have plagiarised him. Either that or the website you got the quote from spelled it wrong, which would also explain why you have credited churn_ill twice: Once in the copy and paste and once when you typed it.

I didn't claim that google has nothing to say - I claimed that you have nothing to say, but since you are good with google then you might want to look at the context which that quote comes from in the first place.

I think that I have made my point here, and I think also that we have managed to take this thread rather off topic, so I won't be continuing our discussion here from now on. If you decide that you would like to pursue this further then please feel free to start a thread in the Hot Topic Zone of this forum and I will gladly respond. Thanks.

[divineinspiration]

is he

Tragicomedy, I swear.

'I are the Bestest' said he.
'Have you been drinking? Again?' - said she.

You actually followed my lead. Unsuspecting Mistress might even take you to her service! But you just expect me to start new topic as reciprocation. Hmm, let me see How desperate you are.


Signed:
Ace Of Waspy R.I.P.OSTE.

[Pincushion]

But you just expect me to start new topic as reciprocation.

Heavens, it seems that all that psychobabble does lead to demonstrably wrong perceptions. I expect nothing of you whatsoever, however despite my boredom with your lack of intellect, I am polite enough to continue dialogue with you elsewhere if you so choose.

I accept that you are new to these forums and I accept also that I obviously didn't make things sufficiently clear in my last post: There is a place on the forums for this sort of discussion and that place is the Hot Topic Zone. Continuing this discussion on this thread strays outside what is courteous here and though you may be so uncouth not to care about that, I do care. And I am not so "desperate" to argue with an idiot that it will make me continue here.

Tell you what - if you haven't the balls to finish this off in the correct arena, why don't you claim it as some sort of victory right here, because I shall not be posting on this thread again and you can have the last word by default?

I've added a photo of a wasp having its brains sucked out by the proboscis of a large insect. Is that what happened to you, waspy?

[divineinspiration]

And I am not so "desperate" to argue with an idiot that it will make me continue here.

Being subjected (made) by any female member on this forum to do anything is a privilege and since your acting out, which you don't control, places you out of the game, not continuing here seems a very good idea for you.

Also, your balderdash (your 947 words against my 286) excludes you from any constructive discussion here or there. And according to your own standards makes you look desperate.

You're not only barking at the wrong tree, you're in the wrong forest.