PDA

View Full Version : New FS-site launched


K-man
03-19-2005, 6:56 AM
Hi all FS-fans.
At last we have launched our site. Specialized in full weight facesitting with sinlge and multiple women.

Faceseat!! You will love this site :-)

We will update the site 2 times a week.


Have a look at:
http://www.facesitcrush.com

And of course here is a sample pic of what you can expect to see there:


Regards,
K-man

PS. Our yahoo group facesit_angel will of course continue but with preview pics from our site. DS

locutus
03-19-2005, 7:46 AM
get them nude, then you may actually have something woth joining. just my opinion

helt
03-19-2005, 7:51 AM
Awesome pics

that double FS while handcuffed is my biggest fantasy

mantagray
03-19-2005, 8:06 AM
my opinion - full weight clothed can be some of the most erotic facesitting - the different clothing adds new dimensions to the action. This site looks quite promising to me...

mantagray
03-19-2005, 8:14 AM
... but it looks like the sitter's faces aren't shown, which is a pity.

locutus
03-19-2005, 9:49 AM
just my humble opinion, but non-nude facesitting is pointless to me. you might as well have some guy sit on your face! i mean, what's the difference? To me, i want a nice naked cunt on my face! It's the same thing with the 'sistas' site. i respect everyones preferances, but i find it very difficult to understand. but, whatever floats your boat!

ralphster30
03-19-2005, 10:17 AM
I say Good for you!I wish you luck in your adventure.Give it some time and let people take a look and see what you have to offer.I particularly enjoyed the lady in the maid outfit showing off her pantied clad bottom.

K-man
03-19-2005, 12:05 PM
Thanks everyone for the useful feedback. I guess it's very difficult to satisfy all different tastes about facesitting. This web site is specialized in full weight multi girl facesitting and personally I prefer the women wearing clothes (minimum panties and bra), which also will be the main content of the site in terms of nude vs. clothed FS. I'm of the opinon that clothes leaves a lot for the imagination as opposed to naked material.

Regards,
K-man

dan1
03-19-2005, 4:03 PM
as usual, lead in looks good,
few pics, different subjects, ie;can standing face sitting etc; but when you look round the dite, ie models, you get pics, no upload they are just teasers,
no dis-respect to the site but so cheesed off with big launches, promising loads, you join and its not delivered.
example. can the webmaster name 2 of the girls in the pics on the models page.

K-man
03-20-2005, 12:07 AM
dan1
I do not understand your feedback. Do you mean that we have to little freebies on the web site? As you know the idea with the free tour is to let the vistitor see what he's buying before being a member. Just so you know we've driven a yahoo group for over 5 months with freebies from Angel. We decided that 1 model was not enough so we decided to add more models to our site and we'll continue doing so. Our aim is to have a quality site with specific content specialized in full weigth facesitting.

Could you elaborate on your example?? I can name all the models on the model page all people can because everyone can read their names there. But if you mean their real names, in my opinion that's irrelevant because how would you be sure that the names stated there would be their real names?

As I said before I think this thread is very useful for us so we can improve the site. So please come with more feedback and opinions.

Thanks,
K-man

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/facesit_angel/

http://www.facesitcrush.com

undrneath1
03-20-2005, 4:38 AM
just my humble opinion, but non-nude facesitting is pointless to me. you might as well have some guy sit on your face!

This has to be one of the dumbest comments I think I've ever read on this board.

dan1
03-20-2005, 4:58 AM
Good answer K-MAN,
not really interested in the girls names, just thought would pose the question, as all to often nowdays pics are put on sites which have been taken from somewhere else, so the front of the site looks good, but once your in its poor.
extra girls are always great,
this is just feedback asa lot of new sites thnat first get advertised on this board, are a quick buck making attempt.
and the people doing these sites are not into the actual scene,
but anyway you seem genuine so good luck,
i do like the look of your site so far,

K-man
03-20-2005, 5:45 AM
Hi again Dan,

Ohhh, I see what you mean. No no no. We produce our materal ourselves. I've been into this fetish all my life. I thought before the Internet era that I was really weird having this fetish, but about 6-7 years ago, I discovered smother.com and got really aroused about it. It was fantastic to realise that I'm not alone having this fetish.

In the future I hope to produce a black list with scammers who rip off people and steal copyright protected material, to protect users and other content providers within this fetish area.

Since our site is newly opened we have 9 sets of pics and 3 clips whereas 2 of them are FS. Our next update will be 23:rd of March with new FS pics.

Regards,
K-man

Faceseat
03-20-2005, 9:08 AM
K man- congrads on your new site...People on here do nont realize how hard it is to launch a new site and they make useless comments that make no sense whatsoever. I appreciate your hard work and cant wait to see more. This is the kind of stuff that I really love. As we all know, I love full weight and multi sitting, now if you can just throw in a few butt drops, a little blood (even if its fake), anda broken nose or two, I would bow down and say ...you are the man!

locutus
03-20-2005, 1:06 PM
[QUOTE]Originally posted by undrneath1
just my humble opinion, but non-nude facesitting is pointless to me. you might as well have some guy sit on your face!

This has to be one of the dumbest comments I think I've ever read on this board.

["to each their own!" said the woman as she kissed her horse.

locutus
03-20-2005, 1:09 PM
Originally posted by undrneath1
just my humble opinion, but non-nude facesitting is pointless to me. you might as well have some guy sit on your face!

This has to be one of the dumbest comments I think I've ever read on this board.

well you might as well have a guy sit on your face!

undrneath1
03-20-2005, 1:13 PM
how would you know clothed facesitting was comparable to having a guy sit on your face unless you've experienced both situations already?

headpop
03-20-2005, 1:24 PM
I like the skirt action. It might even be way sexier than nude..

mantagray
03-20-2005, 1:50 PM
Yeah it's definitely sexier. For me, all types of facesitting have their own appeal, but the clothed smothering stuff is best, or maybe starting clothed, then gradually building up to nude, with plenty of movement and sexy dominant talk. Desert Phoenix are the pinnacle of achievement so far, those girls were just so horny, so in control, and maybe even enjoying themselves. Just having a girl stroll in naked, stretch her arse open and slap down over a guy's nose seems to miss a lot of the point to me.

I've just finished a membership with Anaconda, and some of their earlier stuff is fabulously erotic (Chelsea Blue - subject of a recent post on this board - is among the best). But their more recent stuff is all nude, crude, obvious, and once you've seen a few clips, pretty much unsexy. I also got fed up with the girls screaming and yelling all kinds of abuse and bs... particularly Sienna (Olivia Saint).

So K-Man, coming back to your site , I think you're on the right track. Make it high quality and erotic. Work in the nudity when appropriate for a real high.

al-uk
03-20-2005, 1:59 PM
This has to be one of the dumbest comments I think I've ever read on this board.

I agree with underneath1... there is a whole range of clothed facesitting which is just as erotic as nude. Thongs, panties, Bikinis, short skirts all enhance the experience for me... I enjoy nude but its silly to discount all clothed. Personally I'm not too turned on by jeans FS, but its clear lots of guys like it .. so who am I to say its 'pointless'. We should all accept a range of other folks opinions & try to understand them rather than dismissing them out of hand

mantagray
03-20-2005, 2:15 PM
This pic from K-Man's yahoo group illustrates my point about erotic facesitting. It's practically a work of art. I love to imagine what it's like under there!

Al-UK, I agree with your comment about jeans sitting. It looks kind of sexy, but for me part of the appeal is the sensual feel of the clothing, which denim doesn't have. Maybe for guys that like jeans, it's because of their "everyday" appearance, it's realistic and therefore more erotic than some of the strange implausible scenarios in many "nude from the opening frame" facesitting movies.

K-man
03-20-2005, 3:15 PM
I agree that everyone has the right to their own tastes. I personally does not like nude facesitting. As I pointed out in my reply to dan1 earlier erotic facesitting as explained by mantagray leaves more up to the viewer to do fantasies about the girl and the way she sits on a guy's face. That's my favorite type of facesitting. I hope I can get more feedback when I do more postings in the future. B T W next one will be on wednesday the 23:rd. :-)

See ya,
K-man

BluMac81
03-23-2005, 3:21 AM
Originally posted by headpop
I like the skirt action. It might even be way sexier than nude..
Dito :)
This looks like a really good site!
I really like the roleplay aspects (dress ups), multi-girl fs, and i love the models, especially the fact that they have women ranging in all sizes. And that their 'bbw' women aren't grossly overweight *cough* bbwfacesitting.com *cough*, but are just 'thick'...well.... that's at least the way i like it hehe. I think I will join it :) I hope there are lots of clips and pix (and the the clips are longer than that short (yet hot) one in the tour)...hmm, any reviews?

BluMac81
03-23-2005, 4:17 AM
So....I joined it facesitcrush :) Here's my review

The Good:
-Good varities of hot models
-Quality pictures
-Integrated roleplaying
-Hot clips (I really loved the Nurse Lola video)
-Easy to navigate site

The Bad:
-Quantity...nothing much there yet..but it's a new site so that's understandable :)
-Hiding the models faces (I guess for confidentiality...but still, the looks on the models faces while facesitting is a factor)
-Mediocore food crushing

Overall, I am glad I joined :) I'm really lookin forward to the updates since this site is so specifically designed for my particular preference of facesitting :D (i.e. fullweight, clothed, roleplaying, double-sit, thick women)

If the designers are reading this btw, I do have some suggestions if you would like some constructive criticisim :)
1. Get more long, fullweight facesit videos like the Nurse Lola one
2. Don't edit out so much in the videos (even the 8 seconds of the facesit-ee gasping for breath is hot)
3. Maybe get rid of the masks? (Is it really necessary?)
4. Kick the 'crushing' up a notch to crushing insects/small animals like Chloe does (they usually do lobsters, goldfish, snails, and other crustaceans) It would make it 1000 times hotter a clip/picture, trust me. Crushing food is...well...bleh.
5. Also about the crushing. A wonderful tool in making those photoshoots are glass tables/chairs and sometimes mirrors. No better vision for a facesitting fan to get an 'under the glass view' of a butt-crush ;) if you must stick with food crushing than this would compensate for the most part :)
6. Consider alternative methods of facesitting such as more 'side-saddle' facesitting and possibly some under-thigh smother

Other than that, I am really impressed with this site. Nicely done :) I can see this site rising to the top of all facesit sites in the future, it will be the next Smother.com ;) lol
Good show :)

pantyman
03-23-2005, 5:16 AM
Originally posted by locutus
just my humble opinion, but non-nude facesitting is pointless to me. you might as well have some guy sit on your face! i mean, what's the difference?
Yeah you're right, a guy puts on a pair of panties and it's impossible to tell the difference :rolleyes:

pantyman
03-23-2005, 5:23 AM
Originally posted by BluMac81
Kick the 'crushing' up a notch to crushing insects/small animals like Chloe does (they usually do lobsters, goldfish, snails, and other crustaceans) It would make it 1000 times hotter a clip/picture, trust me.
That shit is fucking sick!!! :mad:

John
03-23-2005, 12:38 PM
Originally posted by BluMac81

4. Kick the 'crushing' up a notch to crushing insects/small animals like Chloe does (they usually do lobsters, goldfish, snails, and other crustaceans) It would make it 1000 times hotter a clip/picture, trust me. Crushing food is...well...bleh.


What a great idea. While you're at it, make sure you sell everything you own before they shut you down....

headpop
03-23-2005, 12:51 PM
A hampster?

BluMac81
03-23-2005, 1:06 PM
Originally posted by John


What a great idea. While you're at it, make sure you sell everything you own before they shut you down....

lol fine, I guess everyone isn't into that. It's not illegal btw, the chloe site does it all the time with no issues. Hamsters though would be pushing it.

Anyway scratch that if you want. I had another idea for what might make for some good unique content on this site. Human furniture. Like you could have two of those lovely ladies in business suits sitting on the backs of men while they play chess or something hehe. You could also kick that up a notch and venture into what hasn't been done yet, and combine human furniture and food crushing. Maybe even make it a game between two ladies, who can get the food crushed the fastest on the backs of men. Those poor slaves though lol

peterek2001
03-23-2005, 4:43 PM
K-man :worship: :worship: :worship:

BluMac81
03-23-2005, 9:11 PM
K-man? You around?
and I second the
:worship: :worship: :worship: :worship: :worship:

noface
03-23-2005, 9:44 PM
I prefer the barer ass version of facesitting, of which if that Elissa would plop on me I'd love:) Nice butt's though...that's a big plus always!

K-man
03-24-2005, 10:42 AM
I'm here BluMac81. I've been away for a short trip. Thanks everyone for the feedback both the good and the constructive ones and espcecially BluMac81 who took the time to write such an extensive review, well done!! I totally agree with your constructive feedback. I'll answer them below:

1. Yes, we have realised that our clips are a bit to short. The next photo session this will be considered so they will be longer.

2. I guess you refer to Lola's FS clip. The reason that is edited is because we wanted to do the clips longer if possible with editing means. This will be no issue when we shoot longer videos without interuptions.

3. The masks will disappear in the next photo shoot we do. Currently we have material produced so this will take a couple of month I would guess.

4. The crushing topic is very sensitive on this forum and in general too, I would imagine. Crushing living animals is out of the question for us. That's torture. Besides we would not do anything illegal. I've a question about this to the forum members who strongly dislike this kind of content. Is crushing dead, lobsters or crabs considered to be object/food crushing or animal crushing??

5. That will come. We have talked about designing a special crush board where you can see the crushed object from different angles.

6. As long as it's full weight, yeah why not.



Regards,
K-man