PDA

View Full Version : Forum rule number 9


wow2389
07-12-2010, 5:27 PM
"Forum Rule 9:


Do not, ever, for any reason, post pictures of anybody who is under 18 years old...

Do not post stories (fiction) that involve anybody under the age of 18.

Do not discuss underage (younger than 18 years old) people in any way that relates to the main topics of these Forums (i.e. “fetish,” “facesitting,” “trample,” “Domme/sub,” etc.), or in any way that includes any kind of “sexual” situation.

Exception (and only barely): You MAY post (text only) personal experiences where YOU were a minor.

HOWEVER: this must only be done to be informative, and should not be written to be erotic. ERR on the side of caution because it is the job of the moderators and administrators to use THEIR judgment to decide if the post breaks a Rule.

Do not post artistic renderings, computer-generated images, or any variant thereof that depict anybody who is underage - no exceptions



Breaking this Rule 9 is likely to get you banned from MDFF."

Why is this rule in place? In the United States, there is no law forbidding sexually explicit literature involving persons under the age of 18. Pictures and videos, I understand, but there is nothing prohibiting literature. I see no moral argument against it, just as it is ok to write a book about killing and torturing kids, you should be able to involve them in sexually explicit material. Writing a fictional story that doesn't involve real persons, hurts no one, and if thats not your particular brand of vodka, then don't read it! Writing a non fictional story is just describing an historical event. If we banned all literature that someone in the world found morally corrupt or offensive there would be no books at all. So why ban it?

:think2:

anter
07-13-2010, 5:26 PM
i'm 100% with you dude, but private server and have private rules. No one says this is a democracy, it's actually a monarchy ruled by the owner of the site.

undrneath1
07-14-2010, 1:05 AM
The rule was the personal decision of the site owner.

flyinemo09
07-14-2010, 3:34 PM
I completly agree wow2389

steponme38
07-14-2010, 4:33 PM
Child pornography will get you a LONG stay in prison. A child is defined as anyone under 18 years old. A lot of the stuff on this site borders on pornography. Ask Penthouse Forum magazine why they don't have stories involving minors in their magazine.

I support the rule against stories about minors. If you want to read stories about sexual encounters involving minors, I'm sure you can find some sites if you look hard enough.

anter
07-14-2010, 6:52 PM
Child pornography will get you a LONG stay in prison. A child is defined as anyone under 18 years old. A lot of the stuff on this site borders on pornography. Ask Penthouse Forum magazine why they don't have stories involving minors in their magazine.

I support the rule against stories about minors. If you want to read stories about sexual encounters involving minors, I'm sure you can find some sites if you look hard enough.

why? are you morally against stories about minors? or just legally? I for one, don't see anything wrong with stories.

vertago
07-14-2010, 9:48 PM
you are missing the point ! It' s a FORUM rule, a forum run by someone ! someone who has chosen to have some moral standards ! I absolutely agree with those standards ,100% ! My advice to you is...... comply or , if you don't like the rules here find a place you can agree with.


just my opinion..... ?

undrneath1
07-15-2010, 3:51 AM
Every once in a while a new member comes on here and feels there needs to be a rehash of a discussion already done months and years ago about the validity of a rule we have in place here.

Quite simply, that's what the owner wants, that's what the administrator and the mods want and it's what 99.9% of the members have had no problem with based on past opinions.

Vertago is right. You have a problem with it, go elsewhere. When you start paying the bills to keep this forum going every month like John does, you can change the rules to whatever your want.

This thread is now closed since we're not even supposed to be discussing this subject.