PDA

View Full Version : To Alan - re: Katiana


Tush_slave
09-13-2003, 9:42 AM
I gotta go with Smotherman here, too. Alan, I as I posted earlier I emailed Katiana as well and got no response. I emailed about a paid professional session, in case you're wondering. If they can't be bothered to answer that (which you claimed they would) then what WILL they respond to? Obviously, they aren't answering ANYONE"S emails, so stop pretending they do. The nonsense you keep posting about why they don't respond is insulting and patronizing. They don't answer because they are dominant Goddesses who can't be bothered? They why the hell is their email address posted here? Alan, your generosity with the captioned pics has been really cool. I'm sure everyone here really appreciates that. But the email thing - you're just pissing on our legs and telling us it's raining. They've got too many slaves already? Yeah, right. I know quite a few pro doms here in NY and even the most established and expereienced of them would laugh at that notion. They could tell you that about 70% of the inquiries they get about sessions turn out to be full of shit. If they didn't respond to most of them or made themselves unreachable, they would have no paying clients. And these are well known (and hot) doms who've been doing this for years, and the proprietors who run establishments (and there are more in NY than just about anywhere). Trust me when I tell you that I know all about the pro dom biz. More than at least 99% of the people on this board by far. If these girls were serious about doing sessions they'd respond to all who asked about them unless they had good reason not to. How much trouble is the 30 seconds it takes it to respond to an email? There are a few established doms who frequent this board like Lady Dunja who I'm sure would agree with me. I've been around dominant women for most of my adult life and behavior like their's (as you describe it) would be regarded as the arrogant behavior of inexperienced brats, not true doms. As someone else pointed out, a Mistress does not take an arrogant attitude with someone she has not established a dom-sub relationship with. Just because someone's "dominant" doesn't mean they get to behave like a goddess to anyone they meet. If you want to treat someone like a sub, then you first have to actually establish a relationship with them. Being that she has never met or spoken to anyone from this board who's emailed them, that is hardly the case. These women are not the Mistress of any of us yet, so acting like they are is completely presumptuous of them. They haven't dominated us, so why would we act like their subs? Acting like spoiled little princesses does not make them Mistresses. You scold people for not "liking dominant women". Excuse me? Then why would they be here? There's a big difference between being dominant and being rude. Not reponding to inquiries is not being dominant. It's being lazy and disingenuous. And the excuses you make are pretty thin and laughable. Either you are full of shit about their availability, or these girls are not at all serious about doing sessions. Again, we all love the pics you post. But stop playing games with us about emailing them. Personally, I think you're just making most of this up. But if they really can't be bothered responding to any of us lowly assworshippers, then stop posting their email address and wasting all of our time with it. In other words, shit or get off the pot. Stop sending people on a fruitless wild goose chase. Their are too many real doms out there who actually want to play.

Tush_slave
09-13-2003, 1:49 PM
What, no response from the all too thin-skinned Alan?

dream
09-13-2003, 3:25 PM
Alan,
your girls are wonderful and most important "natural"- and your pictures are great - keep up the good work.


Tush_slave

I just wonder why the heck spending all this time to write all this long boring post. Alan never promised an "e-mailing back
guarantee"



Peace

nosypucker
09-13-2003, 11:11 PM
Alan:I'm not going to brag about how many dominant women I know. That would be both foolish and pointless. But one of the characteristics that I have found is that they like to do things their way, and too bad about the submissives. How can a sub determine how a domme should act? If he doesn't like it, don't write to her. If she doesn't like what he writes, too bad about him. It's the sub's job to please the domme, not vice versa. If men are clamoring to kiss her ass, why should she jump through hoops to please them?

Frankly, Alan, I am overwhelmed with admiration for the way you and your ladies have handled yourselves on this forum. It has been one of the best ad campaigns I've ever seen. In a very short time you've introduced us to the dommes, established their images as individuals, shown us some of the finest pictures available on the Net, and built up a strong, very vocal following, which I'm sure will translate to webmasterbob's site, too. When you're ready to start on your own, you've got a ready-made market waiting with bated breath. I don't think an ad agency could have done it nearly as well.

The protests may be loud, but they don't represent a huge slice of your market. The face that your models (or someone else) don't take the trouble to establish mail relationships with anyone who bothers to e-mail them speaks for their authenticity. If they were setting up a racket, they'd string along anyone who might buy something later on. Instead, they're too busy with actual domme-ing and facesitting to waste time on titillating correspondence with window-shoppers.

Keep right on doing what you're doing, Alan. It's succeeding far better than any similar program I've seen in years.