I don't understand????

[FootCleaner]

First, I know this section is for pictures, but this is a question about pictures. Why do 99% of the pictures have naked women in them? When the time is right (almos always), I love naked women. However, why would a woman get naked to have a guy lick her feet or to walk on him? If a woman really owned a slave, would she get completely undressed to walk on him or would she just do it with whatever she is wearing at the time? Again, I like naked women and if half of the pics had naked women, I'd have no problem, but why do 99% either have a bunch of naked women or else a woman bent over in an incredibly uncomfortable position in order to have her foot in a guy's face? If a woman has to get totally naked and then bend over backwards to make a guy lick her foot, there's not much domination going on on her part. I know that I contribute zero pics and I'm greatful to those who do, but I guess my real question is: Can anyone post some pics with normally dressed women getting a laugh out of seeing a guy lick their shoes or lay there while they walk on him? Please?

[Ste Letto]

I agree friend, I think the women in trample pics should be in total control; and that means comfortable and uncompromised. I do like some of the naked or semi-naked pics, but only if the woman looks dominant and in control. I have seen many pics on this site that fulfill that demand so I'm sure somebody will have some you'll like.

I can find a girl in a sweater, jeans and trainers sexier than one in a bikini if she looks good and in control.

[TF0]

LOL they need to make money...skin sells and they probably have the reciepts to prove it.
A girl starts off eith clothe but will be butt nekid by the end of the shooting session hehe :P
Or even more strange, they trample a guy, then strip, then gets another outfit on and finally strips that too. :P

[rugman]

TFO is right. The money made from guys looking for skin far outstrips trample-specific material. I think John was making this point at some point in the past. My own passing experience with commercial T-porn really didn’t demonstrate this to me, but I was associated with a strictly domme-related site, and the women were, in fact, dressed in everything to semi-revealing domme attire to conservative female business dress.:D

[John]

Yep, sales don't lie....while there are plenty of people that would like to see normal attire as opposed to nudity, the *fact* from my experience has been that nudity sells more...

[wilfrobson]

I agree 100% it kind of shows that sites like trample.com and the like have little insight into the workings of a submissive personality; being trampled is symbolic of have surrendered controll, for the female to do so in a traditionally provocative and pornographic manner is a massive contradiction.

www.cfnm.net may have what you are looking for.

[rugman]

Wilfrobson,

I’m going to have to take issue with your point. At least a little bit, anyway.

From my perspective, I tend to think as you do: trample=submission and domination. However, there are a lot of trample fans (tramplers and tramplees) who don’t see it as some kind of power exchange, or only a small, playful act of domination. Some people get into the sensual feelings of it alone… like barefoot trample, or back walking. The woman enjoys the feeling of her man’s flesh against the sensitive soles of her feet, and the man enjoys the soft, relaxing pressure of her tread.

I don’t know what the percentages are, and I think it would be darn near impossible to take a poll because “trample fans” cover an entire spectrum of motivations and feelings of enjoyment. How do you separate out one “group” from another? Where is the dividing line? Is there one? Or more than one?

Then again, the nudity of the woman does not automatically imply lack of dominance. Think of it this way: She’s so hot, so openly sexy that she enjoys walking all over you while she’s completely naked, knowing that you desire her body, her soft curves and supple breasts… and you can’t have any of it. You’re down beneath her feet, and that’s all you’ll ever get. “Suffer, boy!”

Um… just a thought.

But you want one that’ll really put your mind in a confused state? Try this: I have a couple of male friends who are substantially submissive to women. They really enjoy it (which is how I met them). But they’ve both become frustrated with the game-playing that some exclusively domme women play (you know, denying the male any sort of pleasure in a misguided belief that it is domination and will keep the male’s attention for the long-term). So, they ran an experiment.

For a night they both played dom men. They collected a series of rather fetching young lasses who were more than happy to face-sit and trample the guys. What the girls enjoyed was the obvious pleasure that they were giving to their men. If I remember correctly, the evening ended in some rather raucous sex. And everybody got what she/he wanted.

I’ll admit. I raised my eyebrow at that one.

Ken

[FootCleaner]

If sales receipts show that nudity sells, I was unaware of that. I now trust it is correct since people in the know have written it. I fully understand that if you run a business, a profit is a good thing. I just wanted to write that I appreciated the viewpoints both pro and con without any negative sentiments. Thanks for respecting my point of view.